Colbert Rapport
Steven Colbert baffles me. I understand that means little to most of you (yes, all three of you who read this), since I'm the only one who actually watches the Daily Show and the Colbert Report. Ever since he began to helm his own show, I've been trying to find my bearings with him.
For example, the other night I watched an episode on Nova called "The Dimming Sun" about how particulates released into the atmosphere have been mitigating the effects of CO2 and global warming, making the real effects much worse than we thought should the particulates disappear. It frightened me. The next day, the Colbert Report makes it a centerpiece, and Steven's stance? Suck it, Earth. He has firmly established the image of a Bible-thumping ultra-conservative, but I don't buy it. He makes so little sense oftentimes that it's comical, and being a comedian, I assume that's what he's shooting for.
To be honest, I'm disappointed. I've gotten used to Jon Stewart, who presents satire but will often break down into laughter himself over the jokes he makes. That lets me identify with him, and I can see that behind his jokes, he has opinions and a personality. Colbert, on the other hand, has gone full-theater and adopted a persona that I don't know is real or not.
I have a theory, though. You see, Comedy Central already has a satirical news show, so Steven doesn't play up that angle. Instead, he pokes fun at another institution of mass media: the pundit. He plays the true fool, seeking laughs at his own expense in order to hint at the ridiculousness around him.
Or perhaps I give him too much credit. There are many who would say I already give this too much thought. It has bothered me, even while I laughed.
In an unrelated note (unless you follow the contorted pathways of my synapses), I found this most spiffy. It was on Free Energy News, which truthfully out to be called Alternative Energy News. I love stuff like this. Clever mechanisms, especially mechanical, appeal to me. I have an admiration and love for what you might call Self-Adjusting Systems. Like the various systems of the body, and how they self-regulate and even repair themselves in varying conditions. To get that from a system without a programmed central controller (i.e.-the brain) requires a good deal of cleverness, and will earn you as much acclaim from me.
On the other end of the Alternative Energy spectrum is stuff like this. Am I skeptical? You bet. Would I buy the stuff to try it? Yup. It's recent resurgence of popularity due to a certain man being 'approached' and 'threatened' to stop working on it makes me more than a little suspicious, especially since I knew of it before the 'publicity stunt'. Once I get a stable source of income, though, what's the harm in seeing if there's anything behind all the people who have supposedly made it work?
After all, my flight suit plans require two key components: a propellant-less method of generating force, and a compact power source of sufficient energy density. Both tall orders, but I have tall dreams.
Right now, I need to look a little lower and get a job first.
Twilight out.
Post-Script: Do I use 'but', 'though', and 'however' too much?
For example, the other night I watched an episode on Nova called "The Dimming Sun" about how particulates released into the atmosphere have been mitigating the effects of CO2 and global warming, making the real effects much worse than we thought should the particulates disappear. It frightened me. The next day, the Colbert Report makes it a centerpiece, and Steven's stance? Suck it, Earth. He has firmly established the image of a Bible-thumping ultra-conservative, but I don't buy it. He makes so little sense oftentimes that it's comical, and being a comedian, I assume that's what he's shooting for.
To be honest, I'm disappointed. I've gotten used to Jon Stewart, who presents satire but will often break down into laughter himself over the jokes he makes. That lets me identify with him, and I can see that behind his jokes, he has opinions and a personality. Colbert, on the other hand, has gone full-theater and adopted a persona that I don't know is real or not.
I have a theory, though. You see, Comedy Central already has a satirical news show, so Steven doesn't play up that angle. Instead, he pokes fun at another institution of mass media: the pundit. He plays the true fool, seeking laughs at his own expense in order to hint at the ridiculousness around him.
Or perhaps I give him too much credit. There are many who would say I already give this too much thought. It has bothered me, even while I laughed.
In an unrelated note (unless you follow the contorted pathways of my synapses), I found this most spiffy. It was on Free Energy News, which truthfully out to be called Alternative Energy News. I love stuff like this. Clever mechanisms, especially mechanical, appeal to me. I have an admiration and love for what you might call Self-Adjusting Systems. Like the various systems of the body, and how they self-regulate and even repair themselves in varying conditions. To get that from a system without a programmed central controller (i.e.-the brain) requires a good deal of cleverness, and will earn you as much acclaim from me.
On the other end of the Alternative Energy spectrum is stuff like this. Am I skeptical? You bet. Would I buy the stuff to try it? Yup. It's recent resurgence of popularity due to a certain man being 'approached' and 'threatened' to stop working on it makes me more than a little suspicious, especially since I knew of it before the 'publicity stunt'. Once I get a stable source of income, though, what's the harm in seeing if there's anything behind all the people who have supposedly made it work?
After all, my flight suit plans require two key components: a propellant-less method of generating force, and a compact power source of sufficient energy density. Both tall orders, but I have tall dreams.
Right now, I need to look a little lower and get a job first.
Twilight out.
Post-Script: Do I use 'but', 'though', and 'however' too much?